Dr Julie Bakker's Lecture: My Response. Saho Ono

She explained sex differences between men and women and gender identity based on neuroscience research and experiments

She also referred to tendencies of transgender peoples' brains and identities,

and suggested that many aspects of this field are still not understood. 

 

The lecture was quite difficult to understand because I couldn’t keep up with listening to technical and academic English. Moreover, because I’m not strong in science. 

 

I believe scientists or researchers are significant job because all of their efforts create something new and they are meaningful to someone. In this case, research on the brains of transgender people can provide scientific findings about them. And such evidence may promote that more people understand about minorities who suffer from social positions. 

But I don’t have enough interests and patience to focus on single academic study for a long time, so I’m not thinking of working in such job. 

Comments

  1. I thought it would be good if science could increase understanding of minorities.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Me too. I won’t work in science. Researchers and experts are awesome because they are so passionate about what they do.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I found it interesting because I couldn’t catch the part about transgender topics. Indeed, neuroscience was too difficult.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ZOU Qingyang

Airi Inoue

Saho Ono